QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 6 2004, 21:33)

Yep, "gaylord" is one of the all-time classic insults. I reckon that if a sausage-jockey and a carpet-muncher got it on, it wouldn't be a gay sex act; however I think it would still be "gay porn" insofar as the cast are both gay.

i don't think the sexuality of the partakers affects the sexuality of the porn itself... I suspect it's the target audience.

 

Which leads (and I bet you're already thinking this LE) to the obvious question: two phillies munching away on each other...

 

gay porn or hetero?

 

i.e. it's for male as well as female consumption...

 

I think if they are dogs, then it's definitely gay porn, but if they are fit it isn't.

QUOTE (russelldust @ Jun 6 2004, 21:39)

I think if they are dogs, then it's definitely gay porn, but if they are fit it isn't.

You can't argue with that. But does that mean that a bloke shagging a minger could be construed as "gay porn"? Does it depend how butch the bitch is?

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 6 2004, 21:42)

QUOTE (russelldust @ Jun 6 2004, 21:39) I think if they are dogs, then it's definitely gay porn, but if they are fit it isn't. You can't argue with that. But does that mean that a bloke shagging a minger could be construed as "gay porn"? Does it depend how butch the bitch is? that's a tough one.   Need to think about it.     my I love these deep intellectual discussions...

QUOTE (teabag @ Jun 6 2004, 20:02)

QUOTE (Shaney_R @ Jun 6 2004, 13:34) Bravo Bravo, well done teabag, let us know if ya need a couple of extra fingers 2 borrow in future. your scruttocks would be far preferable to fingy action Eh? My fingers will be 2 fat 4 your hole dont u mean

Scruttocks - isn't that the bit between your two holes love?

 

And as for the dilema - say you need your privacy. And more batteries as yours have run out, hence the manual stimulation.

get more beers