QUOTE (Maria @ Jun 11 2004, 12:20)

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:19) QUOTE (Maria @ Jun 11 2004, 12:19) QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:15) its not a big deal. i made a piss take comment about it and lisa asked me to explain myself so i did. But why oculdn't you have done it in the 2 last PMs she sent you, that you ignored ?   hmmnn .. i replyed to both of them No, you didn't   Not to the last one anyway, when she clearly wrote out a detailed explanition asking WHY you said all that shite about kiss arsing DJs or vice versa. o, thats right, you read everything lisa gets sent i did reply to the pms. why would i specifically say to her "shall we continue this descussion over pm's" if i had no intention of replying to he pm's?

QUOTE (Lisa @ Jun 11 2004, 12:22)

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:11) sorry to disapoint you dawn. lisa asked an fair question though and i just gave her my honnest answer. i did try to keep this in the pm's like it should have been did you fuck, I pm'd you several times, the last one & I will post it here to show all, asking for an answer & you never replied, so donyt bullshit, you could have replied to this post with, pm on way & posted your feelings, but no!! you pm'ed twice, the last time was asking exaxtly what you said on here, but i had already replyed on here so didnt see the point of re-itterating myself

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 11 2004, 12:22)

QUOTE (Maria @ Jun 11 2004, 12:20) QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 11 2004, 12:18) Personally I make a point of not namedropping on message boards ... it can so easily be construed as showing off. Yes, that's your way of reading the context. Sometimes it's pretty obvious Maria. E.g. using my previous example, whether TdV is a nice bloke has fuck all to do with a debate about whether he was a good DJ/producer. Ergo, it's just an excuse to mention the fact that one has met him. Some people like to comment that they met someone who they think is a good DJ, someothers blatantly DO name drop and show off, I agree. But Lisas intent is NEVER to show off or 'name drop' as you put it.

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:22)

QUOTE (Maria @ Jun 11 2004, 12:20) QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 11 2004, 12:18) Personally I make a point of not namedropping on message boards ... it can so easily be construed as showing off. Yes, that's your way of reading the context. maria, so your saying the argument is this: i miss understood lisa and she miss understood me   wheres the problem then? the problem, lies, laurence with your previous post, saying im full of bullshit etc & someone had to say it etc!!   No misunderstanding!!

QUOTE (carl nicholson @ Jun 11 2004, 12:22)

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ Jun 11 2004, 12:18) I'm sitting on the fence with this one... though I have noticed some people seem particularly keen on mentioning 'who they know'... Personally I make a point of not namedropping on message boards ... it can so easily be construed as showing off. The old TdV ("was he any good?") debates always amused me - you could guarantee that 2 or 3 people would drop the classic "you can't criticise TdV ... he was a really nice bloke" line. I.e. Look at me, I met TdV! Thats sounds like it may be directed at me.........if so i had met him, i am pretty much best mates with his dad (Whom i take to ibiza with me every year without fail), i am promoter for all TDV london events and have held memorials in Brixton Academy & Heaven and raised thousands of pounds for charity, so i think i have a right to say my piece of anything related to Tony! i'm sure it was a genralised comment. TDV could have been interchangeable with andy farly, paul glazby etc.

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:24)

why would i specifically say to her "shall we continue this descussion over pm's" if i had no intention of replying to he pm's?

Exactly

QUOTE (carl nicholson @ Jun 11 2004, 12:22)

Thats sounds like it may be directed at me.........

I am not criticising people for implying (in an appropriate context) that they know/met/boned someone [semi-]famous.

I am specifically criticising name-dropping, which is a completely different thing.

 

The TdV debates are a little distant, so I can't remember whether I had any specific objections to your posts.

Anyhow it's not a big deal to me, I'm not gonna lose any sleep over it; I just think name-dropping is a bit sad.

Edited June 11, 200420 yr by LiquidEyes

QUOTE (Maria @ Jun 11 2004, 12:27)

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:24) why would i specifically say to her "shall we continue this descussion over pm's" if i had no intention of replying to he pm's? Exactly

I have recieved one pm from you, in reply to my first one I sent you, saying that you would reply to my pm, when you get home as you was leaving work, I seen you on line several times & pm'd you, you chose to ignore, then after a while, you posted on the board!!!

QUOTE (Lisa @ Jun 11 2004, 12:29)

I have recieved one pm from you, in reply to my first one I sent you, saying that you would reply to my pm, when you get home as you was leaving work, I seen you on line several times & pm'd you, you chose to ignore, then after a while, you posted on the board!!!

i wasnt aware you took priority over every other thread.

if i relised you would get upset about it i would have replyed to you 1st

hahahahah atht has gotta be the funniest thing you have said yet!! ok, so maybe I do, but at least it takes me a while to bore people, you do it by being in existance dear boy, your breathing bores the air!!!

QUOTE (Lisa @ Jun 11 2004, 12:32)

hahahahah atht has gotta be the funniest thing you have said yet!! ok, so maybe I do, but at least it takes me a while to bore people, you do it by being in existance dear boy, your breathing bores the air!!!

Come on now, lets all just take deep breaths!!!! Seems like people have issues with others, so lets just try and leave it at that hey!

QUOTE (Lisa @ Jun 11 2004, 12:32)

hahahahah atht has gotta be the funniest thing you have said yet!!

at least something good has came out of this thread

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ Jun 11 2004, 12:31)

QUOTE (Lisa @ Jun 11 2004, 12:29) I have recieved one pm from you, in reply to my first one  I sent you, saying that you would reply to my pm, when you get home as you was leaving work, I seen you on line several times & pm'd you, you chose to ignore, then after a while, you posted on the board!!! i wasnt aware you took priority over every other thread. if i relised you would get upset about it i would have replyed to you 1st no but my point was, you didnt reply via pm, after saying you would, oit took me two further pm's & to ask on the post, before you replied Laurence!!   & as for Maria, readinng my pm's, wrong, I actual ly said, that you are quite an ignorant twat to her on msn & she asjked why & I told her that I had pm'd you several times & you had not replied, ok, justification over

Mr Happy talks some bollocks sometimes. Also, I think he's over-reacted a little on this occasion. However he's anything but boring!

 

Just my two cents Lisa - I think you over-reacted to Mr Happy's original joke (i.e. substituting "dickhead" in his quote of my post!) Even if it wasn't very funny (well I laughed!) it was still blatantly a joke.