WEBSITE BLATENTLY COPIED!

 

This the 'new and improved' 25th version Tom? You forgot to take out the bits you copied from Virgin Trains on some of the pages like...

 

 

BODY {scrollbar-face-color: #999999; scrollbar-shadow-color: #cccccc; scrollbar-highlight-color: #999999; scrollbar-3dlight-color: #999999; scrollbar-darkshadow-color: #cccccc; scrollbar-track-color: #cccccc; scrollbar-arrow-color: #666666}

 

content=""

name=keywords>

content=""

name=description>

 

 

 

ALL ABOARD

hmmm blatantly copied, have to disagree there. have u even seen the 2 sites? now u must have been looking for a part in question to discover this

  Quote

clint_the_mint said:

hmmm blatantly copied, have to disagree there. have u even seen the 2 sites? now u must have been looking for a part in question to discover this

 

I have to admint, looking at

 

www.insomniacz.com

 

and

 

www.virgintrains.co.uk

 

they do look incredibly similar from a design perspective...

 

The page grid is almost identical, the "quick links" use the same graphics albeit in different colours, and half the pictures are in the "../../Virgin%20Trains_files/" directory.... Now if you go to www.virgintrains.co.uk in Internet Explorer and then File > Save As > Save, it will save a html file as "Virgin Trains.htm" and it will save all pictures, and relating files, under a subdirectory called "Virgin Trains_files" - upload this directory to a web server and the space between "Virgin" and "Trains" gets transformed to the "%20" code.

 

I'm not casting any dispertions here other than it does indeed look like the Virgin Trains homepage as used as a template. Maybe whoever wrote the site gained permission first? We don't know, so it's not our place to say...

if i was Virgin Trains i'd sue

mmmm i see what u mean within certain aspects of it about the design.

il have to get my little head into finding out some more