Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by itslef but the wrod as a wlohe.

I'll agree with that ... read that far easier than some peoples posts on here

tidyturd said:

I'll agree with that ... read that far easier than some peoples posts on here

 

Kinda resembles Mr Happy's spelling ability though.

yeah but easier to figure out

tidyturd said:

yeah but easier to figure out

 

sad thing is that what wub wrote is a lot easier to decipher than a lot of posts on here!

Taht's qiute irtnseenitg to raed. But as ohters hvae pinoetd out, it deos rheatr rsebmlee the pitosng sylte of a few ppees....

wub_wub said:

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by itslef but the wrod as a wlohe.

 

Mr Happy will be pleased. Thats explains his terrible grammar.