Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • CTW Promotors
  Quote
Maria said:

  Quote
CreamyC said:

 

 

 

No because random bollox is general posts about anything, FAO's are completely different to this.

 

What if people decide to turn off theior PM function because they don't want to use it ? New members etc..

 

This is another advantage of the FAO forum...

 

This is a pretty lame excuse, the function should be set to PM on when they join, if they choose to turn it off then thats up to them. The FAO forum is not used for this purpose anyway.

CreamyC™
Email:
CreamyC@ClubTheWorld.uk
MSN: CreamyCTW@Hotmail.com
Mobile: 07956 462 642 (T-Mobile)

  • Replies 37
  • Views 682
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • CTW Promotors
  Quote
Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Thank you. Someone with half a brain.

CreamyC™
Email:
CreamyC@ClubTheWorld.uk
MSN: CreamyCTW@Hotmail.com
Mobile: 07956 462 642 (T-Mobile)

  • CTW Promotors
  Quote
Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Yes know what you are saying but would this not also come across as cliquey??? more so than FAO forum??? confused.gif

Techno, Techno, Techno

  • CTW Promotors
  Quote
miss_diddy said:

  Quote
Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Yes know what you are saying but would this not also come across as cliquey??? more so than FAO forum??? confused.gif

 

Not really know. Its public cliquey. Thats worse.

CreamyC™
Email:
CreamyC@ClubTheWorld.uk
MSN: CreamyCTW@Hotmail.com
Mobile: 07956 462 642 (T-Mobile)

  • Author
  • CTW Admin
  Quote
Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

i'm sure this is in the pipeline, until then FAOs need to stay IMO

James@ClubTheWorld.uk
CTW FounderClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...

  • Author
  • CTW Admin

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

James@ClubTheWorld.uk
CTW FounderClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...

  • CTW Members
  Quote
James said:

  Quote
Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

i'm sure this is in the pipeline, until then FAOs need to stay IMO

Oh well, I guess its going then...

  • CTW Promotors
  Quote
James said:

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

 

well there you go then peeps, to avoid all cliqiness, do away with fao & pm function!!! undecided.gif

Techno, Techno, Techno

  • Author
  • CTW Admin

confused.gif

 

no not yet !

James@ClubTheWorld.uk
CTW FounderClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...

  • Author
  • CTW Admin
  Quote
miss_diddy said:

  Quote
James said:

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

 

well there you go then peeps, to avoid all cliqiness, do away with fao & pm function!!! undecided.gif

 

no you cant remove PMs ! I was kind of joking, i.e. a PM between 2 people is of course 'cliquey' in that its only between 2 people !

James@ClubTheWorld.uk
CTW FounderClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...

  • Author
  • CTW Admin
  Quote
Maria said:

No not yet - but it will be gone when you get group PMs ?

 

yes, no need for it then !

James@ClubTheWorld.uk
CTW FounderClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...