Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • CTW Members
  Quote
liquideyes said:

  Quote
ReBirth said:

Like dropping in your samples from the broser straight into the step sequencer, and then it automatically loads it into the sampler. And when you want to timestrecth a pre-made loop, you quickly adjust it to 16 or 32 bars etc...whereas with others you first have to import the samples, or open up a sampelr on a channel and then import the sample into that etc..then open up a seperate editor to time stretch etc etc..

 

Obviously Fruity is a lot more streamlined as a soft-sampler. But citing this as evidence that Fruity is better than Cubase/Logic/whatever is a bit superficial.

 

There are things I can do much more quickly in FL, compared to Cubase, but ultimately FL is very limited. Essentially it's a virtual sampler with some sequencing abilities tacked on.

 

Saying FL is "better" than say Cubase (because of its slick sampler-style abilities) is like saying "Microsoft Word is better than Fruity because it has a great spell-checker". shrug.gif

 

 

fruity has a spell checker?????

 

TAXI!!

  • Replies 50
  • Views 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • CTW DJs
  Quote
Scream said:

  Quote
liquideyes said:

  Quote
ReBirth said:

Like dropping in your samples from the broser straight into the step sequencer, and then it automatically loads it into the sampler. And when you want to timestrecth a pre-made loop, you quickly adjust it to 16 or 32 bars etc...whereas with others you first have to import the samples, or open up a sampelr on a channel and then import the sample into that etc..then open up a seperate editor to time stretch etc etc..

 

Obviously Fruity is a lot more streamlined as a soft-sampler. But citing this as evidence that Fruity is better than Cubase/Logic/whatever is a bit superficial.

 

There are things I can do much more quickly in FL, compared to Cubase, but ultimately FL is very limited. Essentially it's a virtual sampler with some sequencing abilities tacked on.

 

Saying FL is "better" than say Cubase (because of its slick sampler-style abilities) is like saying "Microsoft Word is better than Fruity because it has a great spell-checker". shrug.gif

 

 

fruity has a spell checker?????

 

TAXI!!

 

a sequencer with a spell checker? scratchchin.gif

i like the sounds of this wink.gif

Mr Happy's fishy fish MangaFish munch munch

MSN & e-mail - mangafish@mangafish.net
AOL - MangaMorgan
Online mixes - http://www.mangafish.net/mixes/

  • CTW Members
  Quote
liquideyes said:

Saying FL is "better" than say Cubase (because of its slick sampler-style abilities) is like saying "Microsoft Word is better than Fruity because it has a great spell-checker". shrug.gif

 

AAAAAARGH...I didn't say Fruity is better than the others nut.gif

 

  • CTW DJs

I know you didn't ReBirth! smile.gif

 

My disagreement is with digitalliquid (for saying there is nothing you can't do with Fruity), and with the overall notion of comparing Fruity to Cubase/Logic/etc!

large.av-91.gif.449166b45e170fe384bdf684

  • CTW Members
  Quote
liquideyes said:

I know you didn't ReBirth! smile.gif

 

My disagreement is with digitalliquid (for saying there is nothing you can't do with Fruity), and with the overall notion of comparing Fruity to Cubase/Logic/etc!

 

u BASTARD !! smash.gif

  • CTW Members
  Quote
ReBirth said:

  Quote
liquideyes said:

I know you didn't ReBirth! smile.gif

 

My disagreement is with digitalliquid (for saying there is nothing you can't do with Fruity), and with the overall notion of comparing Fruity to Cubase/Logic/etc!

 

u BASTARD !! smash.gif

 

now eat some humble pie you bitch!! lol.giflol.gif

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...
image.png
Clubbing the world together ...