Fruityloops & FL Studio

[Digital Liquid]

I'm with Clare on this one.

 

I can't speak with any experience of Logic Pro Audio, although, it resides on my pc.

 

Another "beastie" to master - perhaps this is the kick I need to try it properly !

 

....he he... Not when I've just got FL4.1 studio running...

 

That's got lots of scope left for investigation... especially a new Vst : Orange Vocoder ...gggorgeous...

 

[ReBirth]

digitalliquid said:

I can't speak with any experience of Logic Pro Audio, although, it resides on my pc.

 

Well, Logic is pretty easy to use and so is Cubase and Pro Tools.

 

At the end of the day, u're still gonna make the same sounds whichever sequencer u're using....because u're either using outside samples or making them with VST's, and you can use any VST in any program these days..so people that say one soudns more professional than the other are kidding themselves, and are probably not using the software correctly.

And when u tell people that Guyver, Olly Perris, Rowland & Wright etc uses Fruity then they go like : "Yea, but they don't make "good" or "imaginative" tracks" etc etc...well, that's down to personaly opinion, but the sound which is produced is still top notch so it actually takes their argument away

 

Show me something in Logic or Cubase that I cannot do in Fruity...and then I might be convinced...

 

 

[James]

Does anyone on here use Sonar ? I've not seen it mentioned yet and its one of the industry standards (aledgedly ?) Its obviously a massive product and quite possibly 'too' techy for the average home musician - but I'm wondering what the pros and cons are aginst it vs say Reason 2.5 ?

[Mr_Happy]

ReBirth said:

Well, Logic is pretty easy to use and so is Cubase and Pro Tools.

 

At the end of the day, u're still gonna make the same sounds whichever sequencer u're using....because u're either using outside samples or making them with VST's, and you can use any VST in any program these days..so people that say one soudns more professional than the other are kidding themselves, and are probably not using the software correctly.

And when u tell people that Guyver, Olly Perris, Rowland & Wright etc uses Fruity then they go like : "Yea, but they don't make "good" or "imaginative" tracks" etc etc...well, that's down to personaly opinion, but the sound which is produced is still top notch so it actually takes their argument away

 

Show me something in Logic or Cubase that I cannot do in Fruity...and then I might be convinced...

 

 

i'm not the slightest bit experenced in these matters - but i deffo agree with what your saying there

[ReBirth]

James said:

Does anyone on here use Sonar ? I've not seen it mentioned yet and its one of the industry standards (aledgedly ?) Its obviously a massive product and quite possibly 'too' techy for the average home musician - but I'm wondering what the pros and cons are aginst it vs say Reason 2.5 ?

 

Sonar is quite good. Probably the easiest one to use from them all, but I'm not too keen on it personally...but it's only the interface that puts me off...others swear by it