cubase sx

[Tony P]

anyone use this, and is it much different to any of the other cubases??

[Scream]

ok i'm not name droppin, but when i spoke to maddox he said he prefered cubase 5 as he knew his way around it totally as compared to cubase sx. So i assume it's changed a bit, but i wouldn't know as i've never really used either.

 

use logic that kicks ass!!

[Guest]

Scream said:

ok i'm not name droppin, but when i spoke to maddox he said he prefered cubase 5 as he knew his way around it totally as compared to cubase sx. So i assume it's changed a bit, but i wouldn't know as i've never really used either.

 

use logic that kicks ass!!

 

 

yes you are so name dropping!! you could have just said well from what I have been told!!!

[LiquidEyes]

I think Cubase SX is better in almost every way (and that's coming from someone who has used VST for years).

 

* It's more powerful

* It has a much better interface

* It's more stable

[DIRTYRASCAL]

Get on SX2 mate. Its sooooo much easier to use. If you know your way around vst 5 then you will figure it out !!!! Dont let the new graphics scare you !!

[Guest]

DIRTYRASCAL said:

Get on SX2 mate. Its sooooo much easier to use. If you know your way around vst 5 then you will figure it out !!!! Dont let the new graphics scare you !!

 

 

 

we got it all, but how to use any of it!!! HMMMMMMMMMM WELL!!!!

 

 

[Tony P]

[James]

SX's interface is soooo much slicker than the old versions and easier to navigate IMO

 

on a side note, is there really no one here who uses Cakewalk Sonar ?

[ReBirth]

I also prefer SX's interface, but I do find it a tad annoying that they changed so much compared to Cubase 5....and it always seem to crash on me

 

But it's EXCELLENT for MIDI.

[ReBirth]

James said:

on a side note, is there really no one here who uses Cakewalk Sonar ?

 

It's very underated isn't it ?

 

I've playd around with it quite a few times and I have to say, I like the interface, and I found it to be very stable

[James]

ReBirth said:

It's very underated isn't it ?

 

I've playd around with it quite a few times and I have to say, I like the interface, and I found it to be very stable

 

Well I confess I've only played around with it for 20 mins on a demo and found it a bit confusing as the screen is quite muddled (compared to SX) - but I was wondering why not many of my friends/people here use it as I see magazines market it as "America's favourite sequencer". On the face of it it just looks a little 'too' involved but I'm sure it and SX do as much as each other. I have settled on Cubase now though as it just 'feels' more natural to me.

[Mr_Happy]

james - when are we gonna hear snippests of your stuff?

[James]

not for fooking ages mate - well at least not a complete song for ages - I tend to just fook about with cool chords, loops & rifts and never actually get anything done!

 

Only literally getting back into the whole thing now mate - I had a few years off so to speak (marriage!) Rest assured I will be firing up lots more questions in these forums soon though

[LiquidEyes]

Same situation here Jim - no finished tunes to speak of, only doodles and ideas.

 

I look forward to tune-swapping in the medium-term future!

[James]

Who knows - may be I'll do a 'demo' CD of just the 'doodles' but I wouldnt want anyone stealing them to complete their own tune lol !

 

My problem is concentration and focus to get something finished - I can keep pissing about and tweaking it because I'm never happy - so much so that once I've finished the tweaked version sounds NOTHING like the original - which actually sounded 'ok' to being with - doh !

 

I'm thinking of getting on a proper course in London actually - so I learn can apply myself better. I also know hardly anything about mastering.