My new tune 'Ear Candy'

[Ian Cashman]

 

1st full version online now!

 

EAR CANDY

[Mr_Happy]

some of it sounds a little raw and crackerly - might just be the speekers on this comp (not on me main computer) or it might be the sound degraded from the compression algorithem

 

like the sounds other than that tho. sounds like a rework of an old arcade game (or reminds me of dark arcades or yesteryear)

[Ian Cashman]

its only a wanky 128kb/s mp3.. thatll be why theres a bit of distortion in there

[Mr_Happy]

i did notice that - but 128kbps shouldnt give that much distortion - but like i said, on this computer i only have pc speekers. my actual studio pc (if u can call it that) is in a diff room

[Ian Cashman]

1st full version online now

 

ive called it Ear Candy

 

what do ya reckon??

[CreamyC]

I cant hear it mate ?!?!?

[Ian Cashman]

Mr_Happy said:

i did notice that - but 128kbps shouldnt give that much distortion - but like i said, on this computer i only have pc speekers. my actual studio pc (if u can call it that) is in a diff room

 

anyway.. i want comments on the tune, not the mp3 quality, cos that is not important to me.. soz

[Ian Cashman]

CreamyC said:

I cant hear it mate ?!?!?

 

the link should work.. (it does for me..)

 

you might need to 'right click save target as....'

[Agent]

I like earcandy m8. Im not right into trance but this tune i like.

It's not over produced with effects. The nova lead sounds wicked and the virus bass pad things are clean and not over distorted. I cant hear anything wrong with it technically, all the sounds are clear etc.

 

Nice m8

[Mr_Happy]

modular1 said:

Mr_Happy said:

i did notice that - but 128kbps shouldnt give that much distortion - but like i said, on this computer i only have pc speekers. my actual studio pc (if u can call it that) is in a diff room

 

anyway.. i want comments on the tune, not the mp3 quality, cos that is not important to me.. soz

 

as i said - 128kbps shouldnt affect the quality so my original statement still stands

[Ian Cashman]

Mr_Happy said:

modular1 said:

Mr_Happy said:

i did notice that - but 128kbps shouldnt give that much distortion - but like i said, on this computer i only have pc speekers. my actual studio pc (if u can call it that) is in a diff room

 

anyway.. i want comments on the tune, not the mp3 quality, cos that is not important to me.. soz

 

as i said - 128kbps shouldnt affect the quality so my original statement still stands

 

1--128kb/s mp3s sound wank...end of.... 2-- i dont want to use this [censored] thread as a mp3 quality discussion!!! its supposed to be about my [censored] tune!!!!!

[Mr_Happy]

modular1 said:

Mr_Happy said:

modular1 said:

Mr_Happy said:

i did notice that - but 128kbps shouldnt give that much distortion - but like i said, on this computer i only have pc speekers. my actual studio pc (if u can call it that) is in a diff room

 

anyway.. i want comments on the tune, not the mp3 quality, cos that is not important to me.. soz

 

as i said - 128kbps shouldnt affect the quality so my original statement still stands

 

1--128kb/s mp3s sound wank...end of.... 2-- i dont want to use this [censored] thread as a mp3 quality discussion!!! its supposed to be about my [censored] tune!!!!!

 

chill m8

 

1) 128 will only sound wank on hi-end systems and most computer sound cards rnt high end

2) take sum prozak m8

[LiamStyles]

Fook sake, 12 posts and only one has actually commented on the actual content of the tune!

 

Well mod, i think its another solid production. You seem to have your own style and i like that. Like i said to you on msn the other night, its quite dark and moody, which is more up my street. Not over produced in anyway whatsoever, cant wait til you can send me them on cd so i can play it out.

 

Top marks mate

[Mr_Happy]

listening now.........

[Mr_Happy]

not a bad tune - only imo the drums a bit to sharp and dull 4 the type of tune it is

 

but thats only a preference thing (how i would have produced the same tune) rather than a critasisum