CTW Members Blink Posted March 31, 2003 CTW Members Share Posted March 31, 2003 Would I be right in assuming that if you lower the number of posts per page that you view, then the following benefits would ensue. i) The page will load up quicker for you. ii) The reduced bandwidth demand would free up more bandwidth for other users, thereby making the site faster for everyone else. iii) It would reduce the total bandwidth load on the server, hopefully increasing the stability, and maybe even making things cheaper for James. This is especially true for people like me, who spend the majority of time on the Active Topics page, and are viewing posts just to see the last reply or two, loading up a full twenty or thrity posts just to read someone posting "lol" seems like a waste of time and bandwidth. (I know very little about how websites [censored], and bandwidth and servers, so I could be completely wrong) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTW DJs Mr Happy Posted March 31, 2003 CTW DJs Share Posted March 31, 2003 Would I be right in assuming that if you lower the number of posts per page that you view, then the following benefits would ensue. i) The page will load up quicker for you. ii) The reduced bandwidth demand would free up more bandwidth for other users, thereby making the site faster for everyone else. iii) It would reduce the total bandwidth load on the server, hopefully increasing the stability, and maybe even making things cheaper for James. This is especially true for people like me, who spend the majority of time on the Active Topics page, and are viewing posts just to see the last reply or two, loading up a full twenty or thrity posts just to read someone posting "lol" seems like a waste of time and bandwidth. (I know very little about how websites [censored], and bandwidth and servers, so I could be completely wrong) no blink - ur 100% correct Quote Mr Happy's fishy fish MangaFish munch munch MSN & e-mail - mangafish@mangafish.net AOL - MangaMorgan Online mixes - http://www.mangafish.net/mixes/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTW Admin James Posted March 31, 2003 CTW Admin Share Posted March 31, 2003 correct blink - nice1 - i had changed the default from 20 to 50 because i thought 20 was too low - but come to think of it now its not ! so i've changed it back to 20 now! Quote James@ClubTheWorld.uk CTW Founder | ClubTheWorld.uk | Twitter | Instagram Clubbing the world together ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTW Members NeoN Posted March 31, 2003 CTW Members Share Posted March 31, 2003 correct blink - nice1 - i had changed the default from 20 to 50 because i thought 20 was too low - but come to think of it now its not ! so i've changed it back to 20 now! Think about the modem users ADSL rools Quote STILL ALIVE !! Act like an adult . . . Be false ! MSN >>> NeoNwomB@hotmail.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTW Members Mr Moo Posted April 1, 2003 CTW Members Share Posted April 1, 2003 CABLE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTW Promotors CreamyC Posted April 1, 2003 CTW Promotors Share Posted April 1, 2003 correct blink - nice1 - i had changed the default from 20 to 50 because i thought 20 was too low - but come to think of it now its not ! so i've changed it back to 20 now! I wondered why mine was back down to 20. Quote CreamyC™ Email: CreamyC@ClubTheWorld.uk MSN: CreamyCTW@Hotmail.com Mobile: 07956 462 642 (T-Mobile) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.