Can you make any good anagrams of your name?

[Stu]

QUOTE (neet @ May 12 2004, 14:24)

Nita Rice Cretin ai! Wonderful.

tin 'a' rice.

 

can you get rice in tins?

 

(apologies for the lack of imagination)

[neet]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 14:26)

QUOTE (neet @ May 12 2004, 14:24) Nita Rice Cretin ai!  Wonderful. tin 'a' rice.   can you get rice in tins?   (apologies for the lack of imagination) rice pudding? yum.

[Guest Jay]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 12:53)

thats not an anagram of your name... [/quote] i knew you'd right that.

 

 

right was wrong.

 

write.

 

aha

[Guest Kether]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 14:16)

oh, but in fairness, the player that was pretending to be a computer must've been pretty good anyway.

Kaspararov has been beaten many times, just not in a full series of games. The change in strategy alone may have been enough to beat Kasparov as he could predict what moves the computer may have played.

 

If, all of a sudden, he's up against a flesh and blood opponent and he perceives a genuine switch in play it's going to affect his performance massively, especially under the pressurised, timed conditions they play in.

 

The person playing against him wouldn't be under the same sort of pressure because he doesn't have all the people watching. He more than likely would have had the computer suggesting possible moves and it wouldn't have mattered so much if he'd lost.

[Guest Jay]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 14:16)

did you know the moon landing was a fake too?

 

i did.

 

i was shocked when i found out that that time is apparently the only time we have ever been to the moon.

 

i assumed we had been numerous times.

 

i have also heard the theory (i cant know how true it is, but i have my doubts) that astronauts would need much thicker suits if they were on the moon because of the radiation from the sun.

 

it does sound relatively plausible but then how wuld you explain space walks??

[Guest Kether]

QUOTE (Jay @ May 12 2004, 15:45)

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 14:16) did you know the moon landing was a fake too?   i did.   i was shocked when i found out that that time is apparently the only time we have ever been to the moon.   i assumed we had been numerous times.   i have also heard the theory (i cant know how true it is, but i have my doubts) that astronauts would need much thicker suits if they were on the moon because of the radiation from the sun.   it does sound relatively plausible but then how wuld you explain space walks?? Which moon landings were fake?

[Guest Kether]

http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/oplett...jsp?id=ns232623

 

QUOTE

We don't need the Very Large Telescope to help disprove the lunar landings conspiracy theory. Everyone who watched the Apollo lunar landings will remember the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector experiment that was used to determine the precise distance from Earth to the Moon. If Apollo hadn't got there and put the laser reflectors on the surface then what have we been bouncing laser light off for the past 30-odd years? Howard Haigh Wigan

[Guest Jay]

 

the first and only one apparently.

 

i will admit that i didnt read this i was told, but the first moon landing (i.e. Armstrong / Aldrin) was the only time we have apparently been to the moon & that was fake.

 

The conspiracy theory is based around irregularities with the film (dont know what exactly but you could probably find it on the Web) & the fact that it was all done to beat the russians in the space race.

 

The russians were the rirst into space with sputnik, & the US faked it basically to save face.

 

 

[Alex]

For all the hassle NASA get's from the conspiracy theorist loons out there, they may have well just filmed it in a hanger in Florida instead of wasting billions of Dollars beating the Russians to the Moon.

[Guest Jay]

QUOTE (Kether @ May 12 2004, 16:02)

http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/oplett...jsp?id=ns232623 QUOTE We don't need the Very Large Telescope to help disprove the lunar landings conspiracy theory. Everyone who watched the Apollo lunar landings will remember the Laser Ranging Retro-Reflector experiment that was used to determine the precise distance from Earth to the Moon. If Apollo hadn't got there and put the laser reflectors on the surface then what have we been bouncing laser light off for the past 30-odd years? Howard Haigh Wigan   if it was a consipiracy Kether, would it be that easy to disprove.   we can never know.

[Stu]

thats not an anagram of your name...
i knew you'd right that.

[/quote]


right was wrong.

write.

aha

QUOTE (Jay @ May 12 2004, 15:23)

fuck.

[Guest Kether]

Interesting Site debunking the conspiracy theorists.

[Stu]

basically, from what i can remember, the car things that were up there (that looked very flimsy) were in real-life very flimsy and made of tin-foil. according to a scientist. also, most of the pictures actually had the cross-hair of the camera behind the astronaut in the picture. the sun was at the wrong angle, and so the shadows were wrong. that thing about the space suits too.

 

i'm pretty sceptical (about both the moon landing and the conspiracy).

 

that guy that you've quoted may have just said that.

 

tbh, give a shit.

[Stu]

QUOTE (Kether @ May 12 2004, 16:16)

Interesting Site debunking the conspiracy theorists.

thats a fuck-load to read and i've not finished my essay yet. its in for 5.

[Guest Kether]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 12 2004, 16:18)

QUOTE (Kether @ May 12 2004, 16:16) Interesting Site debunking the conspiracy theorists. thats a fuck-load to read and i've not finished my essay yet. its in for 5. Better get a wriggle on then, love.