Records that dont stay in time...

[Aaron]

QUOTE

I like my monitors LOUD! I like to dance just as much as the crowd, so loud monitors are a must.

 

You can still do that without monitors... well i do anyway, but then in a small venue the dynamics are different (i'm guessing) to a big and the reverb is greatly reduced so the sound is still very clear and punchy

Edited May 20, 2004 by Aaron

[LiamStyles]

Agreed, but if you have one or two good monitors right by your loaf its just better

[Aaron]

[LiquidEyes]

QUOTE (LiamStyles @ May 20 2004, 21:51)

I like my monitors LOUD! I like to dance just as much as the crowd, so loud monitors are a must.

^ agreed. It's a fucking nightmare mixing in a venue where there are NO speakers pointing directly towards you ... and all you can hear is this great muddy swamp of reverberating bass.

 

It's all about DEFINITION!

[Stu]

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ May 21 2004, 09:47)

QUOTE (LiamStyles @ May 20 2004, 21:51) I like my monitors LOUD! I like to dance just as much as the crowd, so loud monitors are a must. ^ agreed. It's a fucking nightmare mixing in a venue where there are NO speakers pointing directly towards you ... and all you can hear is this great muddy swamp of reverberating bass.   It's all about DEFINITION! you pedant...

[colin66]

QUOTE (Ian Cashman @ May 19 2004, 22:01)

anyone else got records that you find are just an absolute twat to keep in time with others?

Yea, I have this problem with all my records

[Guest]

i find hardcore impossible to keep in time as its all fluffy samples with little deffinition (as well as being painful to listen to)

[Lisa]

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ May 21 2004, 14:22)

i find hardcore impossible to keep in time as its all fluffy samples with little deffinition (as well as being painful to listen to)

you mean happy hardcore Laurence?

[LiquidEyes]

QUOTE (Lisa @ May 21 2004, 14:59)

you mean happy hardcore Laurence?

Does anyone still make that shite?

[Lisa]

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ May 21 2004, 15:12)

QUOTE (Lisa @ May 21 2004, 14:59) you mean happy hardcore Laurence? Does anyone still make that shite? yeh a few

[Guest]

QUOTE (Lisa @ May 21 2004, 14:59)

QUOTE (Mr_Happy @ May 21 2004, 14:22) i find hardcore impossible to keep in time as its all fluffy samples with little deffinition   (as well as being painful to listen to) you mean happy hardcore Laurence? All hardcore is fluffy. even the 'harder' stuff. its the samples, if the samples were crisp and punchy, then the music would just sound cluttered and a noise (not that it doesnt already) at that bpm

[LiquidEyes]

Call me a genre-fascist, but I refuse to accept that hardcore is "proper" music. If somebody can provide an example of a hardcore track that isn't a completely mindless, one-dimensional insult to my intelligence, I'm all ears.

[Aaron]

dont hold back will you

[Guest]

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ May 21 2004, 15:31)

Call me a genre-fascist, but I refuse to accept that hardcore is "proper" music. If somebody can provide an example of a hardcore track that isn't a completely mindless, one-dimensional insult to my intelligence, I'm all ears.

i've heard a few hardcore tunes that arnt completely mindless.

 

'techno dread' and 'the technodread alliance' has created a few hardcore tracks that have actually held my attention.

 

doesnt meen endorse the genre mind

[Lisa]

aww it's not all that bad, couldnt be doing with it all the time tho