Jay being banned.

[Guest Kev]

QUOTE (teabag @ May 21 2004, 10:34)

you might as well rename this site www.gurn.net

You cant have two sites called gurn.net. Get with the programme.

[Stu]

QUOTE (teabag @ May 21 2004, 10:39)

QUOTE (Stu @ May 21 2004, 10:37) QUOTE (teabag @ May 21 2004, 10:34) you might as well rename this site www.gurn.net someone's already got that one. duh. DUH havent been on here for a bit sorry think you missed the point.   rubbish.

[LiquidEyes]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 21 2004, 10:38)

or highly amusing that James misunderstood the blatant sarcasm?

I disagree. I wouldn't say it was blatant. When James interpreted it as a post by Jay using Phil's account, it did create a doubt in my mind as to whether Phil posted it.

 

I reckon it's all just a big misunderstanding.

[Stu]

QUOTE (Kev @ May 21 2004, 10:40)

QUOTE (teabag @ May 21 2004, 10:34) you might as well rename this site www.gurn.net You cant have two sites called gurn.net. Get with the programme. i made that joke first.   get in.   WINNER

[LiquidEyes]

(P.S. It wouldn't be the first time somebody had posted using someone else's login.)

[Stu]

right - it doesn't even look like Jay logged in as Phil and posted it. it doesn't even look like a proper quote. he just put [Jay] and {/Jay] around what he wrote.

 

James should've at least checked whether Jay had at any time posted that. its not good practice to take what rr says as gospel.

 

we'd all be cyber ffs.

[russelldust]

and what was phil_rr/jays' point?

 

I'm a bit lost by the whole thing...

 

would be nice if a few people more people said how out of order the comments directed at ben were...

 

totally out of order to my mind.

 

[Guest]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 21 2004, 10:38)

or highly amusing that James misunderstood the blatant sarcasm?

not really. it happens often enuf

[russelldust]

perhaps James checked the ip address the post came from?

[Stu]

QUOTE (russelldust @ May 21 2004, 10:45)

and what was phil_rr/jays' point? I'm a bit lost by the whole thing... would be nice if a few people more people said how out of order the comments directed at ben were... totally out of order to my mind.

oh my god.

 

1) this is nothing to do with what Kether said about Ben. that's nowt to do with Jay.

 

2) Phil_rr posted (as a joke) 'as' Jay - by putting [Jay] and [/Jay] round what he said.

 

3) James didn't see the joke and thought Phil was quoting Jay and banned him.

 

I'm just trying to get Jay unbanned cos he can't do anything himself - he can't post.

[LiquidEyes]

QUOTE (Stu @ May 21 2004, 10:44)

James should've at least checked whether Jay had at any time posted that. its not good practice to take what rr says as gospel.

I agree. More checks could have been made. But I still wouldn't call the sarcasm blatant (it certainly made me think twice). Maybe I'm just a bit slow...

[Stu]

QUOTE (russelldust @ May 21 2004, 10:46)

perhaps James checked the ip address the post came from?

seriously... just click on the link at the top of the first post.

 

apply yourself just a little bit...

[Stu]

QUOTE (LiquidEyes @ May 21 2004, 10:49)

QUOTE (Stu @ May 21 2004, 10:44) James should've at least checked whether Jay had at any time posted that. its not good practice to take what rr says as gospel. I agree. More checks could have been made. But I still wouldn't call the sarcasm blatant (it certainly made me think twice). Maybe I'm just a bit slow... given.

[Alex]

Why did anyone pay any attention to what Phil said in the first place.

[russelldust]

QUOTE (Alex @ May 21 2004, 10:52)

Why did anyone pay any attention to what Phil said in the first place.

valid point...

 

I think phil_rr needs to say whether he posted that comment or not and then we can ban/unban whomoever...

Edited May 21, 2004 by russelldust