Should Louise be allowed to

[Phil rr]

hrmm

[Alex]

Yes, under supervision, great things may be achieved... possibly...

[nuthead53]

this is more pointless........

[Louise]

[raverbird (jinx)]

it keeps me amused, hehheeh. keep up the good work

[Phil rr]

QUOTE (Louise @ Jun 11 2004, 19:56)

u know that

[SexyNic]

surely the question should be...

 

...should Phil rr be allowed to post pointless polls/threads/posts?

[Phil rr]

QUOTE (SexyNic @ Jun 13 2004, 09:05)

surely the question should be... ...should Phil rr be allowed to post pointless polls/threads/posts?

no, otherwise i would have posted

 

"should i be allowed to post pointless polls"

 

but i didn't, you see. cunning

[squeakage]

Edited June 15, 2004 by squeakage

[Phil rr]

QUOTE (squeakage @ Jun 15 2004, 19:21)

 

 

editied but thank you, Knight Rider is THE bollox

Edited June 15, 2004 by Phil rr

[Phil rr]

by the way, i voted 'yes'

[Alex]

QUOTE (SexyNic @ Jun 13 2004, 09:05)

surely the question should be... ...should Phil rr be allowed to post pointless polls/threads/posts?

It keeps him out of trouble and off the streets, so yeah he should be allowed to post.

[SexyNic]

QUOTE (Alex @ Jun 15 2004, 20:29)

QUOTE (SexyNic @ Jun 13 2004, 09:05) surely the question should be... ...should Phil rr be allowed to post pointless polls/threads/posts?  It keeps him out of trouble and off the streets, so yeah he should be allowed to post. well i suppose it's the lesser of two evils...

[LTM]

[Ian Cashman]

Phil

Edited June 15, 2004 by Ian Cashman