Does anyone actually use the Live Chat ?

[CreamyC]

Maria said:

CreamyC said:

 

 

 

No because random bollox is general posts about anything, FAO's are completely different to this.

 

What if people decide to turn off theior PM function because they don't want to use it ? New members etc..

 

This is another advantage of the FAO forum...

 

This is a pretty lame excuse, the function should be set to PM on when they join, if they choose to turn it off then thats up to them. The FAO forum is not used for this purpose anyway.

[Capn Jack]

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

[CreamyC]

Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Thank you. Someone with half a brain.

[Lisa]

Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Yes know what you are saying but would this not also come across as cliquey??? more so than FAO forum???

[Maria]

miss_diddy said:

 

 

Yes know what you are saying but would this not also come across as cliquey??? more so than FAO forum???

Yes, but it wont be seen by most of the board.. :s

[CreamyC]

miss_diddy said:

Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

Yes know what you are saying but would this not also come across as cliquey??? more so than FAO forum???

 

Not really know. Its public cliquey. Thats worse.

[James]

Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

i'm sure this is in the pipeline, until then FAOs need to stay IMO

[James]

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

[Maria]

James said:

Capn_Jack said:

The FAO's wouldn't be needed if PM's could be used by a number of people, a bit like a private conference.

 

i'm sure this is in the pipeline, until then FAOs need to stay IMO

Oh well, I guess its going then...

[Lisa]

James said:

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

 

well there you go then peeps, to avoid all cliqiness, do away with fao & pm function!!!

[James]

 

no not yet !

[Maria]

No not yet - but it will be gone when you get group PMs ?

Edited September 16, 2003 by Maria

[James]

miss_diddy said:

James said:

lol Lisa - ALL non-public messages will of course be cliquey (espec. PMs between 2 people!)

 

well there you go then peeps, to avoid all cliqiness, do away with fao & pm function!!!

 

no you cant remove PMs ! I was kind of joking, i.e. a PM between 2 people is of course 'cliquey' in that its only between 2 people !

[James]

Maria said:

No not yet - but it will be gone when you get group PMs ?

 

yes, no need for it then !

[Maria]

ok