tony de vit TONY DE VIT

[CreamyC]

Phil_raa said:

CreamyC said:

I dont want ClubTheWorld cashing in on my name when I'm dead.

 

Kev I'm already selling mugs soft toys with your face on it,.

 

 

 

sorry that should be "I'm already selling mugs, soft toys with your face on it".

 

Nice one, however, I want all proceeds to go to chariddy mate.

[Phil rr]

no

[Sparky]

miss_diddy said:

CreamyC said:

miss_diddy said:

JoeDrawb said:

 

I agree, for example..If Elvis was still alive he wouldn't be the legend he is today and the same goes for others who have died before their time (IMO!)...

 

Joe not trying to pick faults here, but sorry to dissilusion you hon, but Elvis was a ledgend before he died, same as the beatles!!!

 

But they were known worldwide and sold trillions of copies.

 

yes so Joe's example was shite, wasnt it!!

 

Disagree. The use of the Beatles was a perfect example.

 

Paul McCartney is viewed as a hasbeen, whereas John Lennon = Dead = Legend

[Mr Happy]

Zen_Master said:

Tony De Vit made some really cracking tracks, but i dont like the way that Tidy have releas some of his other work posthumously- if he didn't think it was good enough to be released, then why should anyone else.

 

Its exactly the same as the new RR Fierce track Ta Mere, if arguably the best "hard" hard house producers doesn't think one of his own tracks is good enough for release, why is it going to make any difference a few years after his death?

 

Its simple cashing in on dead people- summat that, in my eyes anyway, is just as wrong and depraved as necrophilia

 

i totally agree with u, but would like to add 1 point:

 

the tunes that 'wernt good enuf' was finished off etc by people like glazby so its not as if they were relased in thier crappy form.

 

having said all that - still agree with ur statement 100%